Iñigo Parra

[ˈiɲiɣo ˈpara]

Portrait of Iñigo Parra

San Francisco, CA

I am a PhD student in Linguistics at UC Berkeley working on interpretability and on how deep learning can help us understand language and human cognition.

I am also currently a research scientist intern at Snowflake, where I work on reinforcement learning, agent behavioral analysis, and model routing.

Latest publications

Neural Correlates of Language Models Are Specific to Human Language

Parra, I. NeurIPS 2025 / PMLR

TL;DR: This study investigates the neural correlates between language models and human brain activity, demonstrating that the language representations underlying modern language models align specifically with human language processing patterns rather than general sequence processing. I also show shared geometrical properties of LM and brain representations.

Read the paper
Method overview: language-model embeddings predict brain responses through ridge regression, and the geometry of both spaces is compared with Gromov–Wasserstein distance and CKA.

Adaptive Compute Efficient Learning via Conceptual-Criticality

Parra, I.; Bharathi, M.; Kumar, M.; Kumar, P.; Mishra, P. AAAI 2025

TL;DR: We introduced a conceptual-criticality framework for adaptive compute allocation in neural networks, enabling models to dynamically adjust computational resources based on input complexity. This approach achieves significant efficiency gains while maintaining or improving model performance.

Read the paper
Architecture diagram: a dynamic threshold selection module decides how the input is routed through a stack of layers.

Noise Be Gone: Does Speech Enhancement Distort Linguistic Nuances?

Parra, I. ACL 2024

TL;DR: I investigated whether speech enhancement techniques preserve or distort fine-grained linguistic features. My findings revealed that noise reduction improves overall intelligibility, and that enhancement methods do not significantly alter phonetic distinctions critical for downstream linguistic analysis.

Read the paper
Token processing diagram: each token is copied, one copy is degraded and then enhanced, and the final dataset keeps both the original and the enhanced versions.